Research Methods & Ethics

1972

Tuskegee Syphilis Study Exposed

A federal study begun in 1932 followed 399 Black men with syphilis, and 201 without, while withholding treatment. Jean Heller's 1972 AP report led to its end and to the National Research Act, institutional review boards and informed consent rules.

Historical photograph from the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
National Archives Atlanta, GA (U.S. government) / Public domain (Wikimedia Commons)

Key people

Jean Heller
AP journalist whose July 1972 report made the study public.
Peter Buxtun
PHS venereal disease interviewer who objected to the study in 1966 and 1968, then went to the press.
Edward Kennedy
U.S. Senator who chaired hearings leading to the National Research Act of 1974.

Source

Jean Heller, Associated Press, July 1972; Ad Hoc Advisory Panel Final Report, 1973 (opens in a new tab)

The study began in 1932 in Macon County, Alabama, a rural county still tied to its plantation past, where most of the men selected were poor sharecroppers. Working with the Tuskegee Institute, the U.S. Public Health Service enrolled 399 Black men with late-latent syphilis and 201 uninfected controls, offering them free medical exams, free meals and burial insurance. The aim was to record the natural history of untreated syphilis, an idea drawn from the Oslo study, in which Caesar Boeck had withheld treatment from almost 2,000 patients between 1890 and 1910. The men were not told they had syphilis; they were told they were being treated for bad blood.

By 1943 penicillin was the treatment of choice for syphilis and becoming widely available, but the men in the study were not offered it. When a PHS mobile treatment unit reached Macon County, staff told local doctors that each enrolled man was under study and not to be treated. Peter Buxtun, a PHS venereal disease interviewer, wrote to the CDC with moral objections in 1966 and again in November 1968. In February 1969 a CDC panel reviewed the study and decided against treating the men, although by then at least 28, and perhaps as many as 100, of them had died as a direct result of syphilis.

Buxtun eventually went to the press. Jean Heller's Associated Press story broke in the Washington Star on July 25, 1972, and was on the front page of the New York Times the next day. An Ad Hoc Advisory Panel recommended stopping the study in October 1972, and the Assistant Secretary for Health and Scientific Affairs announced its end in November, 40 years after it began.

Senator Edward Kennedy held hearings in February and March 1973. The advisory panel found the study ethically unjustified, and the CDC says there is no evidence that researchers ever obtained informed consent. Congress passed the National Research Act in July 1974, creating the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The commission's Belmont Report, submitted in 1978 and published in April 1979, set out three principles for research on human subjects: respect for persons, beneficence and justice.

The hearings and the act led to institutional review boards and to formal rules for informed consent. The government set up the Tuskegee Health Benefit Program in 1973 to give the survivors medical care, and a class-action lawsuit ended in a $10 million out-of-court settlement in 1974. On May 16, 1997, President Clinton apologized at the White House, where five of the eight surviving men attended. The last participant in the study died in January 2004.

Keep exploring

All 526 moments in the history of medicine. This one is in chapter 6, Trials, scanners and rights