Cardiology
2002
Heart Protection Study (HPS)
In 20,536 high-risk patients, 40 mg simvastatin cut major vascular events by about a quarter, with similar relative benefit even when baseline LDL was low. The size of the benefit depended chiefly on a patient's overall vascular risk.

Key people
- Rory Collins
- Lead investigator, MRC Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford
- Jane Armitage
- Co-investigator; oversaw trial coordination
- Richard Peto
- Oxford epidemiologist and statistician at the Clinical Trial Service Unit, which ran the trial
Source
Through the 1990s, most clinicians treated lipid-lowering as a matter of reaching a target LDL number. If a patient's LDL looked acceptable, the reasoning went, adding a statin offered little. The MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study was designed specifically to test that assumption, enrolling 20,536 adults whose cardiovascular risk was high for reasons beyond their cholesterol levels: prior heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, diabetes, or treated hypertension.
Between 1994 and 1997, 69 hospital clinics across the United Kingdom randomized participants to 40 mg simvastatin daily or matching placebo, and followed them for an average of five years. The primary results, published in the Lancet in July 2002, showed a 24% reduction in major vascular events in the statin group, encompassing coronary deaths, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary or peripheral revascularization. All-cause mortality fell by 13% in the simvastatin arm.
The subgroup that drew the most attention had baseline LDL below 3.0 mmol/L (116 mg/dL). That group gained roughly the same relative benefit as those starting above the threshold, so the result did not depend on the entry cholesterol. The investigators put the gain in absolute terms: five years of simvastatin would prevent a major vascular event in about 70 to 100 of every 1,000 such patients, and the size of that benefit depended chiefly on their overall risk.
Clinicians had routinely withheld statins from diabetic patients without overt coronary disease, from stroke survivors, and from those with peripheral arterial disease on the grounds that LDL was not clearly elevated. HPS enrolled all three groups in meaningful numbers and showed consistent benefit across each. The trial enrolled 5,082 women, and women and patients over 70 showed the same proportional reduction in events; earlier statin trials had enrolled both groups sparsely.
Guideline committees in the United Kingdom, Europe and North America began to base statin eligibility on total cardiovascular risk as well as lipid levels. In 2004 the US National Cholesterol Education Program revised its guidelines in light of five statin trials published since 2001, HPS among them. It made an LDL goal below 70 mg/dL an option for patients at very high risk, including those whose LDL was already below 100 mg/dL.
Keep exploring
Read next · same person
Large simple trials and trial overviews (Peto and colleagues) (1976)
Rory Collins and Richard Peto, key people behind HPS, had long argued for very large simple trials like it. The 1976 entry shows the case they made and the ISIS trials that tested it.
Read this moment
Today on The Clinical Times
Florida dengue outbreak appears to be largest in continental U.S. in decades
Florida has reported more than 250 locally acquired dengue cases this year, with most in Hillsborough County, according to state health officials.
Read today’s top stories
All 526 moments in the history of medicine. This one is in chapter 7, Genes and pandemics


